Jax and Jaxlib versioning#
Why are jax and jaxlib separate packages?#
We publish JAX as two separate Python wheels, namely jax, which is a pure
Python wheel, and jaxlib, which is a mostly-C++ wheel that contains libraries
such as:
XLA,
pieces of LLVM used by XLA,
MLIR infrastructure, such as the StableHLO Python bindings.
JAX-specific C++ libraries for fast JIT and PyTree manipulation.
We distribute separate jax and jaxlib packages because it makes it easy to
work on the Python parts of JAX without having to build C++ code or even having
a C++ toolchain installed. jaxlib is a large library that is not easy for
many users to build, but most changes to JAX only touch Python code. By
allowing the Python pieces to be updated independently of the C++ pieces, we
improve the development velocity for Python changes.
In addition jaxlib is not cheap to build, but we want to be able to iterate on
and run the JAX tests in environments without a lot of CPU, for example in
Github Actions or on a laptop. Many of our CI builds simply use a prebuilt
jaxlib, rather than needing to rebuild the C++ pieces of JAX on each PR.
As we will see, distributing jax and jaxlib separately comes with a cost, in
that it requires that changes to jaxlib maintain a backward compatible API.
However, we believe that on balance it is preferable to make Python changes
easy, even if at the cost of making C++ changes slightly harder.
How are jax and jaxlib versioned?#
Summary: jax and jaxlib share the same version number in the JAX source tree, but are released as separate Python packages.
When installed, the jax package version must be greater than or equal to jaxlib’s version,
and jaxlib’s version must be greater than or equal to the minimum jaxlib
version specified by jax.
Both jax and jaxlib releases are numbered x.y.z, where x is the major
version, and y is the minor version, and z is an optional patch release.
Version numbers must follow
PEP 440. Version number comparisons
are lexicographic comparisons on tuples of integers.
Each jax release has an associated minimum jaxlib version mx.my.mz. The
minimum jaxlib version for jax version x.y.z must be no greater than
x.y.z.
For jax version x.y.z and jaxlib version lx.ly.lz to be compatible,
the following must hold:
The jaxlib version (
lx.ly.lz) must be greater than or equal to the minimum jaxlib version (mx.my.mz).The jax version (
x.y.z) must be greater than or equal to the jaxlib version (lx.ly.lz).
These constraints imply the following rules for releases:
jaxmay be released on its own at any time, without updatingjaxlib.If a new
jaxlibis released, ajaxrelease must be made at the same time.
These
version constraints
are currently checked by jax at import time, instead of being expressed as
Python package version constraints. jax checks the jaxlib version at
runtime rather than using a pip package version constraint because we
provide separate jaxlib wheels
for a variety of hardware and software versions (e.g, GPU, TPU, etc.). Since we
do not know which is the right choice for any given user, we do not want pip
to install a jaxlib package for us automatically.
In the future, we hope to separate out the hardware-specific pieces of jaxlib
into separate plugins, at which point the minimum version could be expressed as
a Python package dependency. For now, we do provide
platform-specific extra requirements that install a compatible jaxlib version,
e.g., jax[cuda].
How can I safely make changes to the API of jaxlib?#
jaxmay drop compatibility with olderjaxlibreleases at any time, so long as the minimumjaxlibversion is increased to a compatible version. However, note that the minimumjaxlib, even for unreleased versions ofjax, must be a released version! This allows us to use releasedjaxlibwheels in our CI builds, and allows Python developers to work onjaxat HEAD without ever needing to buildjaxlib.For example, to remove an old backwards compatibility path in the
jaxPython code, it is sufficient to bump the minimum jaxlib version and then delete the compatibility path.jaxlibmay drop compatibility with olderjaxreleases lower than its own release version number. The version constraints enforced byjaxwould forbid the use of an incompatiblejaxlib.For example, for
jaxlibto drop a Python binding API used by an olderjaxversion, thejaxlibminor or major version number must be incremented.If possible, changes to the
jaxlibshould be made in a backwards-compatible way.In general
jaxlibmay freely change its API, so long as the rules aboutjaxbeing compatible with alljaxlibs at least as new as the minimum version are followed. This implies thatjaxmust always be compatible with at least two versions ofjaxlib, namely, the last release, and the tip-of-tree version, effectively the next release. This is easier to do if compatibility is maintained, although incompatible changes can be made using version tests fromjax; see below.For example, it is usually safe to add a new function to
jaxlib, but unsafe to remove an existing function or to change its signature if currentjaxis still using it. Changes tojaxmust work or degrade gracefully for alljaxlibreleases greater than the minimum up to HEAD.
Note that the compatibility rules here only apply to released versions of
jax and jaxlib. They do not apply to unreleased versions; that is, it is ok
to introduce and then remove an API from jaxlib if it is never released, or if
no released jax version uses that API.
How is the source to jaxlib laid out?#
jaxlib is split across two main repositories, namely the
jaxlib/ subdirectory in the main JAX repository
and in the
XLA source tree, which lives inside the XLA repository.
The JAX-specific pieces inside XLA are primarily in the
xla/python subdirectory.
The reason that C++ pieces of JAX, such as Python bindings and runtime components, are inside the XLA tree is partially historical and partially technical.
The historical reason is that originally the
xla/python bindings were envisaged as general purpose Python bindings that
might be shared with other frameworks. In practice this is increasingly less
true, and xla/python incorporates a number of JAX-specific pieces and is
likely to incorporate more. So it is probably best to simply think of
xla/python as part of JAX.
The technical reason is that the XLA C++ API is not stable. By keeping the
XLA:Python bindings in the XLA tree, their C++ implementation can be updated
atomically with the C++ API of XLA. It is easier to maintain backward and forward
compatibility of Python APIs than C++ ones, so xla/python exposes Python APIs
and is responsible for maintaining backward compatibility at the Python
level.
jaxlib is built using Bazel out of the jax repository. The pieces of
jaxlib from the XLA repository are incorporated into the build
as a Bazel submodule.
To update the version of XLA used during the build, one must update the pinned
version in the Bazel WORKSPACE. This is done manually on an
as-needed basis, but can be overridden on a build-by-build basis.
How do we make changes across the jax and jaxlib boundary between releases?#
The jaxlib version is a coarse instrument: it only lets us reason about releases.
However, since the jax and jaxlib code is split across repositories that
cannot be updated atomically in a single change, we need to manage compatibility
at a finer granularity than our release cycle. To manage fine-grained
compatibility, we have additional versioning that is independent of the jaxlib
release version numbers.
We maintain an additional version number (_version) in
xla_client.py in the XLA repository.
The idea is that this version number, is defined in xla/python
together with the C++ parts of JAX, is also accessible to JAX Python as
jax._src.lib.jaxlib_extension_version, and must
be incremented every time that a change is made to the XLA/Python code that has
backwards compatibility implications for jax. The JAX Python code can then use
this version number to maintain backwards compatibility, e.g.:
from jax._src.lib import jaxlib_extension_version
# 123 is the new version number for _version in xla_client.py
if jaxlib_extension_version >= 123:
# Use new code path
...
else:
# Use old code path.
Note that this version number is in addition to the constraints on the released version numbers, that is, this version number exists to help manage compatibility during development for unreleased code. Releases must also follow the compatibility rules given above.